<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>themolotov.net - comments</title>
  <link href="http://themolotov.net/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"
      href="http://www.themolotov.net/comment.xml"/>
  <updated>2007-07-11T06:24:54-05:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>themolotov.net</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/blog</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Life Expectancy: 800? - Comment #145 on 1/31</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=87#comment145"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-87/comment-145</id>
    <updated>2008-01-31T07:58:39-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>Alan</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Among other things, this made me wonder what kind of effect it would have on our aging process. Do we still look like kids until we hit 100, then look like teens for another 100 years? Do we somehow magically stay at an ideal 20-something for most of our lives? Do we age normally and look like we are really really really really old as we get older?<br />
<br />
I agree that with the current state of affairs in the world, extending a person's natural life span simply increases the likelihood that you will die by some other cause.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>What Is This For? - Comment #144 on 8/22</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=72#comment144"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-72/comment-144</id>
    <updated>2007-08-22T12:09:48-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>ava</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Grammar is not entirely a mash of arbitrary rules; all grammar is is a system to organize words so that people can understand what you're saying, instead of your words coming across as an empty jumble of meaninglessness. Certain parts of grammar, such as the division of words into categories of nouns, verbs, etc. based on what the word describes, are far from arbitrary and are shared by pretty much every language. <br />
<br />
The part of grammar that varies from language to language is the order in which words are put. In some languages, such as Latin or Greek, word order usually doesn't matter. In other languages, such as English, word order is all-important, and in Spanish, word order is equally important, but they use a different order. Is it arbitrary? Yes and no. Obviously <em>some</em> sort of organization is required, or else we'd all be babbling and nobody would have any idea what anybody else was saying, but <em>which</em> type of organization is used doesn't really matter so long as everyone can understand what you're saying. efficiency &gt; prettyness.<br />
<br />
In English, we're pretty constrained by history as to what sort of grammar we can use and still be understandable. Things like split infinitives and no prepositions on the end of sentences come from 17th century attempts to apply Latin syntax to English, and are not part of native English syntax at all. If you split your infinitives, never use &quot;whom&quot; (or use it wrong), and end every sentence you speak with a preposition, no one will really care and everyone will be able to tell what you're saying. On the other hand, if you never use the present tense and put every last one of your adjectives at the tail end of your sentences, people will have a very hard time trying to figure out what in the hell you're saying.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>What Is This For? - Comment #143 on 8/15</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=72#comment143"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-72/comment-143</id>
    <updated>2007-08-15T10:20:11-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>molotov</name>
    </author>
    <summary>But did you <strong>read</strong> what I wrote?</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>What Is This For? - Comment #142 on 8/14</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=72#comment142"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-72/comment-142</id>
    <updated>2007-08-14T02:03:44-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>Alan</name>
    </author>
    <summary>I cringed when I read the title in the rss feed.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Ubuntu: Enough Already - Comment #141 on 7/18</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=69#comment141"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-69/comment-141</id>
    <updated>2007-07-18T07:44:36-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>molotov</name>
    </author>
    <summary>That's what I said; it's a problem that probably affects all of Linux, not just Ubuntu.<br />
<br />
I've had a similar problem with my keyboard on my Powerbook. Currently my DownArrow registers as my RightClick, even after loading different keymaps, trying to override those maps, and then finally trying to FORCE the key to be something else.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Ubuntu: Enough Already - Comment #140 on 7/17</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=69#comment140"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-69/comment-140</id>
    <updated>2007-07-17T07:38:14-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>ava</name>
    </author>
    <summary>More likely the problem was with my wireless card itself; I found hordes of drivers for every other wireless card under the sun except mine, and of the tiny handful that claimed to be compatible with mine, a grand total of zero of them actually worked. </summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Official Blog Of themolotov.net - Comment #139 on 7/13</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=68#comment139"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-68/comment-139</id>
    <updated>2007-07-13T08:42:43-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>Alan</name>
    </author>
    <summary>(No html? I guess that's why you have the Parse Bbcode down there, huh?)</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Official Blog Of themolotov.net - Comment #138 on 7/13</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=68#comment138"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-68/comment-138</id>
    <updated>2007-07-13T08:42:12-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>Alan</name>
    </author>
    <summary>At least I said &lt;a href=&quot;http://alanbeam.net/Blog/135&quot;&gt;that&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; you wrote this...</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Official Blog Of themolotov.net - Comment #134 on 7/11</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=68#comment134"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-68/comment-134</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T08:01:28-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>molotov</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Erin, I don't mean that our interpretations should imply trust or anything. It's important to know the 'official' interpretation of the law (whether or not we agree with it) if only because it will help us avoid breaking it, or plan accordingly.<br />
<br />
Alon, I have no idea what an unofficial sponsor would be, really. I am an 'unofficial sponsor' of Linux. If an organization <em>recognizes</em> unofficial sponsors, don't they become sponsors? Maybe unofficial just means people, somewhere, are getting kickbacks but want to stay unaffiliated for political reasons.</summary>
  </entry>
  
  <entry>
    <title>Ubuntu: Enough Already - Comment #133 on 7/11</title>
    <link href="http://themolotov.net/entry.php?bid=69#comment133"/>
    <id>tag:themolotov.net,2008-01-31:/entry-69/comment-133</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T06:24:54-05:00</updated>
	<author>
        <name>molotov</name>
    </author>
    <summary>That sounds like a Linux thing, not an Ubuntu thing. There may not be a click-to-install driver for your wireless interface, but I'd have a hard time believing that no one in the Linux community could get it to work (but damn, when you run into that situation, it sucks trying to figure it out on your own, if you can).</summary>
  </entry>
  </feed>